Met Office MAVIS USER GUIDES

Audit Summary - February 2026

This audit was carried out by CACI Ltd. on behalf of the Met Office. The testing included a manual audit of a representative sample of pages and components, supported by automated testing tools and assistive technologies.

The audit identified 113 distinct accessibility barriers across the site pages and components affecting 30 different criteria.

The current MAVIS application contains a large number of accessibility barriers across critical user journeys, particularly on the Map, Report Viewer, Weather Thresholds, and Settings areas. These issues prevent equal access for screen reader users, keyboard only users, users with low vision, and users with cognitive impairments. Several failures relate to fundamental architectural patterns that require structural redesign rather than small fixes.

The most significant risks are concentrated around perception of weather information, map interaction, report accessibility, and keyboard navigation.

Key Findings by Severity

Critical

High

Medium

Thematic Areas of concern

Structural issues

Inaccessible Weather content

Weather information — the central purpose of MAVIS — is delivered as:

There is no programmatic access to the underlying data, making weather analysis impossible for users relying on assistive technology.

Keyboard and Screen reader navigation

Site-wide navigation has systemic accessibility failures:

This results in severe barriers for keyboard and screen reader users.

Many core controls are not operable via keyboard:

Inconsistent use of colour labels and instructions

The RAG system, map markers, and report indicators rely on colour alone and labels often lack descriptive meaning. Instructional context is frequently missing.

High Level Recommendations

Redesign core components

Focus on systemic fixes rather than incremental workarounds.

Fix Key Interaction Patterns

Improve Colour Contrast Across The App

Enhance User Guidance

Strategic Recommendations

  1. Stabilise the core application (High Impact / Short term)

    • Navigation and focus issues
    • Add missing labels to critical controls
    • Improve link styling and colour contrast
    • Correct modal focus trapping
    • Add skip links and ensure logical tab order
  2. structural remediation

    • rebuild map marker pattern
    • Fix sidebar / tab patterns
    • Correct heading hierarchy across pages
    • Implement robust keyboard navigation
  3. Accessible Weather Delivery

    • Replace canvas viewer
    • Provide accessible equivalents for weather overlays
    • Implement data tables and summaries for map layers
    • Add timeline status messaging
  4. Experience Improvements

    • Provide comprehensive instructions for thresholds
    • Enhance on boarding and tutorials
    • Improve consistency across pages

Executive Conclusion

MAVIS contains a substantial number of accessibility failures across almost every core feature. Many are core to the page design and layout. Remediation will require pattern-level redesign rather than incremental fixes. Addressing the critical failures, particularly around the map, timeline reports and navigation is essential to ensure MAVIS meets WCAG standards and provides equal access to all users.